Chose where to / multiple destination folders

Feature requests
#21

Thanks.

Really looking forward for this feature as it’s a massive drawback that prevents me to use Insync in production.

Edit :
I often need to sync project folder that have specific names, IE : “J0568 - JobName”
When I use the right click “add to insync” it creates that folder in the root of insync.

What could be workaround if it’s easier in a early stage, is that I’m creating that same folder where it need to be on my drive on the other computer, and I right click and “add to insync”.

This means will be two folders with the same name in the root of insync.
But it would be great to just be able to tell insync that it needs to merge those two folder together.
At least I would have that job folder syncing at the right position on my drives on both end.
Does this make sense?

Not sure, but this might be easier to implement this in a first stage?

What do you think @terpua and @roald

Cheers
Stan

#22

Hi guys, any news on when this will be added to insync, this is really the last issue I have to be able to use Insync in production.

Cheers
Stan

#23

Hi guys,
It’s been 10 months and I was wondering if there was any news for this?
I really need a easy way to sync folders that have to be in the exact same place (paths) on the synchronized computers.
Insync would act as a hub between them.

Any news would be highly appreciated

Stan

#24

Hey Stan,

I realize that this might not work to solve all your problems, but perhaps Bittorrent Sync? You could use it to synchronize your local folders to your remote client, bypassing Drive in the middle. You can still use Insync to drop your folders locally to Drive (for online backup), but BT Sync will handle maximizing your bandwidth to the other end of your sync, and can be set up to sync in place.

We currently use a combination like this for much of our production files, which are large media files.

Good luck!

#25

This is being added to 2.0 as a multi-mount point sync :slight_smile:

#26

yes please +1 …

#27

Hi @terpua

Any news on this?

Thanks
Stan

#28

Hi @terpua

Any news on this?

Thanks
Stan

#29

It’s in our roadmap for 2.0! :slight_smile:

It will be part of the 2.0 private beta once we release a new build.

#30

That’s great news @jaduenas!
I have to confess it’s been two years I’m waiting (asking) this feature, already by email in Nov 2014 with insync 1.1 :wink:
Would you have any ETA on when this will happen? I’m really eager to use Insync as my main sync solution.
Best,
Stan