FEEDBACK WANTED: Insync 3 headless

Feature requests
24

Continuing the discussion from FEEDBACK WANTED: Insync 3 headless:

  1. Why do you need Insync headless?
    Because I can run batch jobs on an unattended machine.

  2. What is your workaround without Insync headless?
    At the moment, I’m using an older version. Works fine, BTW.

  3. What features/behavior would make Insync 3 headless better than Insync 1.5 headless?
    Being supported is more than enough!

  4. Would you prefer to have Insync 3 headless as a separate product or integrated into the GUI?
    Don’t care but being integrated could lead to installation problems… (e.g. libraries compatibility)

  5. What platform(s) do you need Insync headless to work?
    Linux. Maybe useful for MacOS, I don’t know. Useless for windoze.