Insync is one of the more consuming processes

According ps is one of the most consuming process in my system, only some OS components beat it

ps  axco pid,command,time --sort=time

....

   1126 nextcloud                   00:00:04
     15 rcu_preempt                 00:00:07
    676 bluetoothd                  00:00:11
   1070 kactivitymanage             00:00:11
   1538 kio_http_cache_             00:00:11
  19192 chrome                      00:00:15
  18306 chrome                      00:00:18
  18261 chrome                      00:00:24
   1576 insync                      00:00:47
   1038 plasmashell                 00:01:09
    678 Xorg                        00:01:39
    993 kwin_x11                    00:01:42

Nextcloud, with similar features, consume 1/10 of the processor time.
I niced insync to 19 but with few result.
This is unhealty for consume and battery.

How can I solve this problem?

Hi @Guido_Iodice,

Was Insync doing a large sync at the time the consumption was increasing?

Please also send your logs.db and out.txt files to support@insynchq.com with the link to this post.

yes, it does. Despite this, in top I see insync go up very often, unlike nextcloud which rarely goes up. This rise seems to me mitigated with nice=19, but not by much.
I’m sending the files to support.

1 Like

Thank you for sending the files, @Guido_Iodice. I was able to receive them and have forwarded them to our engineers for further investigation.

I measured the insync time after the initial re-indexing, it’s 22, a lot(!) but less than half of total consume after few hours.

1 Like